January 26, 2008

Fireside Chat with Wayne Turmel

Firesidechatsmall

Why do many webinars suck? Is the middle manager's job getting better or worse? Chat with Wayne Turmel

During this 32 minute podcast, I chat with Cranky Middle Manager podcast host Wayne Turmel. This is a lively discussion about middle management and another topic near and dear to Wayne's heart, tips and techniques for presenting web meetings. Find out why Wayne blames the Stock Market for many middle management woes and what it was like to be the opening act for the band, Chicago. I use to play 25 or 6 to 4 on my trombone, but that is a story for another day. Wayne's Cranky Middle Manager website can be found here and his new website called Great Web Meetings can be found here. I have been a guest on the Cranky Middle Manager show several times and I had a blast turning the tables on Wayne and asking HIM the questions. Check it out!

You can listen to my podcast with the Wayne Turmel by clicking here:

You can also download an MP3 version of the podcast here: MP3 Download

And just a reminder.....

Here is the Podcast Feed for the entire Fireside Chat podcast series: View RSS XML

To see the complete list of podcasts in this series, select the Podcasts and Webcasts category on this blog or see the list on my main website here.

You can also find this series on iTunes (and several other podcast sites), just search under my last name for Fireside Chat.

September 23, 2007

Fireside Chat with Mike DeWitt

Firesidechatsmall

What do a mastodon hunter and a manager have in common? Chat with Mike DeWitt

During this 31 minute podcast, I chat with fellow blogger and business consultant Mike DeWitt. We have a lively conversation about management acumen and the best ways to learn how to lead. You can find Mike's blog, called Spooky Action here. Listen to this podcast to find out the three things managers and leaders most need to master to succeed.

You can listen to my podcast with the Mike DeWitt by clicking here:

You can also download an MP3 version of the podcast here: MP3 Download

And just a reminder.....

Here is the Podcast Feed for the entire Fireside Chat podcast series: View RSS XML

To see the complete list of podcasts in this series, select the Podcasts and Webcasts category on this blog or see the list on my main website here.

You can also find this series on iTunes (and several other podcast sites), just search under my last name for Fireside Chat.

June 06, 2007

The Aim of Management Training

I am at ASTD International, and so I have training on my mind.

What ought to be the goal of management training?

  • To provide a lesson?
  • To create a conversation?
  • To create behavioral change?

How does the structure, pace, and style of training change based on how we define the goal?

Who ought management trainers be?

  • People who can present material?
  • People who can facilitate a great conversation?
  • People who are themselves, effective managers?

How does our selection and development of management trainers change based on how we define their core responsibilities?

I think we tend to favor training programs that offer a lesson and trainers who can present materials. And of the items listed above, I think these are the least important goals and responsibilities.

What questions would you ask in an interview if you sought a trainer who could facilitate great conversations? Where might you look for trainers who are effective managers?

How would you define "effective manager?"

January 01, 2007

How will you grow in 2007 - 10 Factors that Enhance Learning and Application

As I get older and wiser (one hopes for that anyway), I become more and more convinced that training needs to be as natural and uncontrolled as possible. That’s right uncontrolled – the less I try to control the training, the better it is. As a long-time recovering control freak, this has been a difficult journey for me. I love to control things! Not trying to control training is a wonderful thing. It takes some courage and confidence, but it always leads to a better outcome. This is also the case when managing meetings and projects.

The most effective learning sessions are not polished, practiced, or choreographed ahead of time. The best training sets the stage for something to happen and let’s things happen. This facilitator’s guide reflects these thoughts and does not offer scripts or minute-by-minute facilitation instructions. I don’t want the material presented in a polished way because I don’t think this approach will encourage application of the techniques.

You might call this the salon approach to training and I think this is the right method for management and leadership development programs. Salons are organic, stimulating, and transformative. Comments become catalysts that change how people approach their work.

10 Factors That Enhance Learning and Application
Here are my top 10 list of the factors that I think improve the application and habituation of learning:   

Sound Science

The training needs to be built on a solid foundation. The techniques need to work. The theories ought to make sense. This may seem like something that does not need to be said, but I have attended training programs that were way off the weird scale. Managers don’t have time for this mumbo jumbo – they need real life concepts and practices that will help them get their jobs done today. Challenging the status quo is wonderful, but introducing something for the sake of being fun or intellectually stimulating is a waste of time and resources.

Star Power

Let’s face it; famous people sell their concepts well. If your managers can see Marcus Buckingham, Tom Peters or Benjamin Zander in person (or even on DVD), that has power. What does this mean? Don’t be hesitant to get a famous face to say what you want to say. Open your training with an inspiring DVD or ask participants to read an article from the Harvard Business Review as prework. There are a lot of famous people saying the same things we are – use that! One caution – resist latching onto gimmicks, acronyms, or flavor of the month type stuff. Our managers have become very sick of this stuff and rightly so. I know this seems like a strange recommendation, but I have seen really smart people swoon over a sexy high profile business DVD. And this can help prime my audiance for a great conversation.

Magnetic Trainer

Are you a magnetic trainer? Magnetic trainers are people who others like to hang around with at work. They’re magnetic because people enjoy talking with them for some reason – maybe they’re fun, interesting, a great listener, or super smart. We all have qualities that help draw people toward us and we need to use that. If people like being with you, they will come to more training sessions and they will participate more fully. Both introverts and extroverts can be magnetic trainers. Being an awesome listener is likely a common trait most magnetic trainers share.

Provocation

Learning often occurs as a result of dissonance – or some difference between what we thought was so and a different perspective. When our training is provocative, it challenged participants to think in new ways. We should not endeavor to be provocative just to be provocative. We need to notice where participants are getting stuck and then offer development that nudges them forward. Sometime is provocative when it causes a strong reaction – for example all of these emotions might be caused by provocation: annoyance, anger, excitement, fascinating, curious, or inviting. While we don’t want to routinely anger our training participants, an occasional bit of anger or frustration, followed with good deep conversation, can be a great learning enhancer.

Evocation

When we are evocative, we help other see things from their perspective – we put people in the scene for themselves. Evocative learning is very connecting. When you see people think about a concept or when they apply it to their situation, they are being evoked. Great training provokes evocation. We want managers to be imagining how they will apply the concepts or techniques in their departments.

Connecting Conversation

Connecting conversation is dialogue that brings concepts, people, and things together. Trainers need to help make connections between what’s being discussed in a training class and real business opportunities and challenges. Have you noticed how lively and engaging conversations are when lots of people jump into it and share their unique perspectives? Connecting conversation draws in participation because it is interesting, helpful, and mentally stimulating.

Diversity of Thought

I love putting together training groups filled with people who seem to share nothing in common. Oh what fun it is to bring these diverse perspectives together on one topic. Everyone learns more and the conversations will tend to be both evocative and provocative. I also like bringing in diverse expert opinions by having participant read articles with opposing viewpoints for prereading. Diversity is not just interesting and healthy, it’s necessary for managers to make good decisions. The training environment is a perfect place to help build managers’ appreciation for diverse thoughts, opinions, and approaches.

Deep versus Wide

I prefer to address fewer training topics for more time. The deeper you can get into a topic, the deeper the learning will be. Trainers often make the mistake of acquiescing to managers who say they don’t have time for training. We pack in 12 topics in a one-day training session knowing all the while that this is not going to lead to a good result. Great training goes deep – it takes some time with the concepts and techniques so that managers can make the connection to their work and realize the training’s relevance.

Does a Job

Great training meets a need. It gets something done. It does a job. When managers need help, there’s a job to be done. Training might be the answer to help fill that need (it is not always the answer, of course). Our training needs to serve managers, employees, and the organization. If we cannot identify the job we want our training to do, we ought to question whether it’s the right training at the right time. This does not mean that the training must be technical. The job might be: help me pump up creativity and energy.

Tactile Trying

Great training invites people to touch it, feel it, and give it a try. Training ought to be a laboratory for safely testing thoughts and techniques. Most of the exercises I recommend are based on real life job tasks and challenges.  The best training engages people in working with the material. We should encourage people to take the training apart then put it back together in the way that best works for them – like a car buff would do to better understand how the engine works.

There you have them, my 10 factors that enhance learning and application. Think about the next training session you plan to facilitate, plan or attend (or send your people to) and how you might be able to strengthen some of these factors for that session. The changes required to help a session go from flat to engaging – from boring to provocative – from abstract to concrete – are often very small. If your training department leaders don’t read blogs (shame on them), print this out and share it with them.

Implications for consultants: What I have just written is not likely music to the ears of traditional training consultants. The traditional business model is to have standard modules, practice the heck out of them to polish your delivery, create a demo video and then pitch. Well, sorry, I would not spend a nickel on most of these programs and I hope you don’t either. Training consultants need to generate the learning experience – fresh each time. But hey – if you disagree, feel free to share your opinion in the comments!

November 26, 2006

Fireside Chat with Mark Wayland

Firesidechatsmall

Escape the sheep dip! - Chat with Mark Wayland

In this 31 minute chat, I chat with Australian learning and development strategy expert, Mark Wayland. We talk about the world of training and development from three perspectives - the senior manager, the manager, and the management trainer. Misery loves company and together, we rant about the often broken systems and practices found in traditional training departments and then offer our thoughts on what companies and training professionals ought to doing to best meet their organizations' development needs.

Want to know what Lisa and Mark think is full of bunk? Listen to this podcast!

You can listen to my podcast with Mark Wayland by clicking here:

You can also download an MP3 version of the podcast here: MP3 Download

And just a reminder.....

Here is the Podcast Feed for the entire Fireside Chat podcast series: View RSS XML

You can also find this series on iTunes (and several other podcast sites), just search under my last name for Fireside Chat.

November 12, 2006

Fireside Chat with Lee Froschheiser

Firesidechatsmall

What's the secret? - Chat with Lee Froschheiser

During this 31 minute podcast, I chat with Lee Froschheiser, who is the President and CEO of MAP Consulting and coauthor of the book Vital Factors: The Secret to Transforming Your Business - An Your Life. We discuss how managers can better respond to change and be nimble, the importance of key indicator's of organizational and departmental health, and our basic beliefs about management and leadership development.

How can we ensure we are ready for unforeseen challenges? Listen to this podcast!

You can listen to my podcast with Lee Froschheiser by clicking here:

You can also download an MP3 version of the podcast here: MP3 Download

And just a reminder.....

Here is the Podcast Feed for the entire Fireside Chat podcast series: View RSS XML

You can also find this series on iTunes (and several other podcast sites), just search under my last name for Fireside Chat.

September 26, 2006

Yale's New MBA Design

Well, it is about time! Yale has announced that it is totally redesigning its MBA program to be more systemic and integrative. Based on what I have read so far, the changes look great. I hope this is like the $4 prescriptions at WalMart and that other schools will soon follow suit and redesign their programs.

I don't know enough to render an opinion on whether the topics and types of experiences will be successful, but the design diagram and basic description look interesting.

What do you think? Would you be any more or less likely to apply for a highly integrative program like this one?

My hopes for the new program:

  • Builds courage
  • Builds connection - students' abilities to build deep intimate business relationships
  • Builds catalystic thinking, flow, and play
  • Builds character and a deeper caring for people and business
  • Builds the focus and drive to execute
  • Builds nimbleness and an ability to lead change
  • Builds passion

(Hat Tip to the Fortune Business Innovator blog.)

September 20, 2006

Why Training Might NOT be the Best Answer

I have two quick comments about this title.

1. I was talking to prospective clients yesterday. They are interested in have me train a few trainers to do classes based on High Impact Middle Management. Nice people, I would love to work with them one day. But they are not ready for training. It became evident that they needed to realign the manager's role because they had admittedly thrown too many initiatives their way - stuffing 50 pounds into a 25 pound bag. Once they realign the role, the training could have real impact.

2. This month, Rosa Say is focusing on the topic of learning and she has asked many guest bloggers to post about learning. I put up a semi-sweet rant against corporate sheep dip universities this morning. See my post here. See all the great posts about learning here.

September 07, 2006

Finding a Great Coach

Interesting thoughts from the Interactions blog and Fast Company blog about the trials and tribulations of finding a great coach.

This is one reason I don't promote my coaching services. It's a relationship that is built from chemistry, so I find that a coaching relationship rarely comes first - it usually comes after other work or partnership.

I guess one could argue that a blog helps you get to know a coach and how she or he is likely to react. But that is only half the chemistry equation, right?

I have met many coaches that I thought I would not want to spend time with even if they paid ME to receive the coaching. There are too many schools turning out "certified" coaches. I once got an email from someone who wanted to coach managers. I asked her if she had ever been a manager - no. I asked her if she ever coached people - no. Then I told her that she has some work to do before she should consider management coaching.

Does a management or executive coach HAVE to have experience being a leader? I think so, but I am willing to include many OD jobs as experience - it's a kind of leadership in and of itself. That said, if I were a leader looking for a coach, I would not select one who had not been in my shoes.

Does a coach need to be certified? No. In fact, I think the certification process often ruins a good coach. That said, I know many certified people who are also wonderful, but I think they are great in spite of not because of the certification process. I am sure most coaches reading this will disagree and might even get angry with me. Well, that's how feel, sorry. If you have read my book Coaching Basics, you know where I stand on coaching.

We all need coaching and we should seek it. Many times, this can be a reciprocal colleague relationship and does not have to be a separate paid gig. If you need extra and objective attention, fork out a few bucks and get great coaching - base your selection on style, the coach's areas of emphasis, and references.

One other thing. The coaching schools are turning out way too many people who are trained to help you find yourself. This sort of fuzzy coaching is needed, but not in the proportions taught. Most leaders I work with need help being more effective results-making-machines who can also build their organization's capacity and culture. Getting the job done, that's an important focus and skill set. And, oh by the way, you will learn a few important things about yourself in the process of kicking butt!

OK, I will get off my box now. :-)

January 25, 2006

How to ensure that training is NOT a waste of time!

Yesterday I shared my not so subtle opinions about why training is often a waste of time. I mentioned a couple common problems:

1. I think the focus of training is often wrong.

2. I think training methods don't facilitate short-term or long-term application.

3. Many training sessions are taught by the wrong people.

So what is the alternative?  I realize that some of my comments might fit into the "don't bite the hands that feed you," category because I am a consultant and trainer for hire. I would LOVE to do training for your company and I think it is important you know where I stand on how training ought to be done. Here are a few thoughts:

The Focus

  • Teach a man to fish....
  • Teach topics and people learn topics. Teach people how to own, think, relate, and work, they figure out and seek out the topics they need to understand.
  • Sheep dip and you have a flock of sterile sheep. This is a fine approach if your employees have fleas.

The focus of your core training should be on creating the space and capability for great thinking and relationships. Engaged and focused individuals and teams will determine the development they need and seek it. To support this highly able workforce, your training resources should be nimble, flexible, and highly custom to each group.

"Oh, but Lisa, we are a huge corporation with hundreds of thousands of employees in different sites. We can't do this. It is highly impractical and tough to measure. Our competency model is the backbone of you training."

Impractical? And the current system makes sense? Tough to measure? Not if you focus on the right metrics. Yep, you can do this and it will cost less than your precious university concept and expensive and fancy knowledge management software (don't get me started on corporate universities and fancy software to track training or "knowledge"). And if your competency model is the backbone of your training, you are likely paralyzed and unable to lift your performance.

I want to train people to think well, work together well, think better together, and plan and execute work. When I am successful, all the other stuff pops up when and if needed. This is the 20% cream of the crop development that gets you the 80% of performance and success.

The Methods:

  • Another 3 day training class? Calgon take me away!
  • Another offsite retreat? Even the king with no clothes can see this is barely helpful.
  • It's like the husband who buys his wife a waffle iron for a gift. He wants waffles! When we schedule these events, we make ourselves feel better. Training professionals justify their existence with classroom days and 4.9s out of 5s on smile sheets.
  • Corporate universities = MACRO approach. Think MICRO NICHE.

Traditional classroom training and online versions that mimic this are not very effective. Sometimes it is great to kick things off, I guess. Classroom stuff is not designed to last. I prefer shorter and more frequent contacts APPLIED to real projects, real goals, real situations.

Like many of you, I have been to some great multi-day training sessions. The five days I spent at Sundance doing the Covey Leadership Week were great. A great perk for me. The instructors were great. I did the morning exercise classes. Sundance was wonderful (even without a Redford sighting). I was grateful to my employer for sending me. I needed the recharge. Did I change my daily habits? Very few. It is OK to offer your managers the opportunity to go to events to meet others and have some fun. And they might learn a few things. But mostly, these events are just that - events. And the costs - zoowwyy!

Let's say a team has a large project they need to plan and implement. There are many developmental needs that will pop up during this project. That's when to work on these things. Spending 30 minutes, three times per week, or one hour, once per week, will go much farther than sending them to a five day project management class months before their project starts. And the topics in the project management class are not likely the same stuff that will come up if you work with the team as the project is unfolding.

"Oh, but Lisa, we are a huge corporation with hundreds of thousands of employees in different sites. We can't do this. It is highly impractical and tough to measure. Doing classroom training with larger groups is more efficient and cost effective."

How practical is it to launch a huge corporate university and spend more money putting on events and tracking training than it would cost to provide excellent development?

The methods: team and individual coaching, breakthrough facilitation, highly personal and individual approaches to training. Nimble development resources. Think MICRO NICHE.

The People:

We get turned on by people who are turned on by what they do! There are two categories of trainers that I seek:

  • Passionate facilitators and evangelists - people who are infectiously energetic and help us find the development we need. They bring in information from others and readily admit when they are not the experts. They jazz our learning muscle.
  • Uber experts - people who are so freaking smart and sharp that they make our minds spin and buzz.

I am sorry, but I see no place for prim and proper trainers who have been certified by schools that teach proper flip chart techniques. I used to teach flip charting 101, by the way. I eek out a guilty giggle now just thinking about it.

Find people that can and are driven to help people stimulate their greatness. Those are the trainers you seek. They are internal entrepreneurs, applying a wide variety of methods to help each team, each department, and each individual move forward with velocity and realize satisfying success. They are facilitators extraordinaire. They will have a command of how to create progress.

"Oh, but Lisa, we are a huge corporation with hundreds of thousands of employees in different sites. We can't do this. It is highly impractical and tough to measure. We hire training professionals with a consistent set of skills from reputable certification firms."

Oh, I give up... I love trainers, I really do. They live to help people, and this is very nice. But many of them should not be training your teams and individuals. I want a trainer who is a leader, a visionary, insanely resourceful, and a little bit quirky/off his or her rocker.

What do you think? This is the kind of training I love doing! Really - it is possible, effective, and a beeter use of your resources.

Subscribe to Management Craft

Blogroll

The Forbes.com Blog Network

  • Forbes.com

Great Tool for Writers!


  • This software has significantly improved my writing and I would not turn in a book manuscript, report, or article before using it. I am endorsing Stylewriter because I LOVE the program! Send me an email if you want to hear more about how I use it. I highly recommend Stylewriter. You can try it out for 30 days.

    Lisa Haneberg

Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 08/2004